Literary Wives: A Reliable Wife by Robert Goolrick

The July read for Literary Wives (more on what this is here) is Robert Goolrick's A Reliable Wife.  This one has long been on my TBR but frequently bumped down due to the seemingly resounding dislike for it.

Unlike May's read, Curtis Sittenfeld's American Wife, I fell in love with this book from the first chapter and adored it right through the grim end.

It's a kind of noir novel, with no noble hearts here, no heroes, just a twisted love story and flawed desires.  I plan to write a formal review, but in brief: set in Wisconsin in 1907, the novel follows Ralph Truitt, a wealthy, sex-obsessed businessman with a broken heart and sad family story who takes out an ad for a wife.  Catherine Land, a con artist and floozy, accepts, and reinvents herself as a staid missionary's daughter.  Catherine plans to off him, but her husband asks her to find his long-lost 'son' (there's some concern about his parentage) and bring him back.  This errand sets off, unsurprisingly, a series of events blah blah blah doom, heartbreak, conclusion!

Seriously, I loved every page.  (Mostly.  Goolrick's writing was a leeeetle too, I don't know, sex heavy for me.  Not porny, but much like Sittenfeld's American Wife, the heavy use of sex to convey intimacy, lack of intimacy, violence, betrayal, etc. was a bit exhausting, and I say this as someone who doesn't mind some sex in her books.)

It's a fascinating read with our Literary Wife frame

1. What does this book say about wives or about the experience of being a wife?

2. In what way does this woman define “wife”—or in what way is she defined by “wife”?

as Catherine's marriage, her identity as wife, is both the catalyst for the horrible events that unfold and, in some ways, the thing that gives her redemption.

On Being a Wife

Our wife in this story, Catherine, responded to an ad for a 'reliable wife, compelled by practical, not romantic reasons', which precisely summed up Catherine's motivations.  (There were, of course, additional, more nefarious motivations, but she wanted a cold, practical partnership.)

Throughout the story, she behaved reliably (however duplicitous her true nature), nursing her husband after his injury and taking up his favorite authors to read to him nightly. And she capitulated, not unwillingly, to a sexual relationship with him.  She received the truth of her husband's past, his broken heart and blackened soul, and held it with an emotional gentleness one would hope our spouse would possess.

Upon being sent to St. Louis to find her husband's long lost son, a man who might not be his own, Catherine strays -- or returns to her true nature.  Embroiled in an emotionally and sexually manipulative relationship, Catherine embodied another kind of wifely loyalty to her cruel lover.  She was, to a point, going to kill for him.

I'm being a little glib, of course, and playing loose and fast with my definition of 'wife'.  Not just a legal definition (which she has, with Ralph), I think in this book, 'wife' might also denote loyalty (but not perhaps fidelity, as Catherine is not monogamous).

She very much 'betrays' the institution of marriage but then again, I'm not inclined to consider the mail order marriage to be in the spirit of the institution either.  Catherine is very much a woman committed to her partner, and the trouble comes when she finds herself split between partners and the call of her lesser self and her greater self.  (Which makes me want to spin off into a long convo about how marriage -- or at least, a lifelong emotional partnership -- can bring out the best of us.  My wife invites the best in me, and I'd like to think I do for her as well!)

Being Defined as Wife

It's interesting how a new frame, a new status, or a ritual transition can change how one sees one's self. I don't think Catherine intended to buy into any sort of romantic or pragmatic notions of wifely-ness and yet, being a wife did indeed change her.

I was greatly reminded of Fay Weldon's She May Not Leave while reading this, as a character in Weldon's novel finds his sham marriage -- meant to help someone get a visa -- convinces him he must be a husband to her, rather than remain in the long term romantic partnership he was a part of. Catherine is dedicated to her lover and her lover's wishes, yet finds herself increasingly unwilling to betray her husband. Domestic life didn't necessarily appeal to her -- she was frequently restless -- but she found a better self emerge once she became a wife. (Goolrick has everyone fall in love with everyone shockingly fast, and on one hand, lonely people might conflate sex with love, so that works, but on the other hand, I don't think he meant it that way, so I'm dubious everyone was truly 'in love' love.) 

In the end, I think being a 'wife' was a definition Catherine never aspired to but found it safe, comforting, and ultimately, a source of unanticipated happiness.  I suppose we can't ask for more in a marriage! (Once more, I'm being glib.  But still.)

As a lover of dark novels like this, gothic-y, noir-y stories that articulate the horrible gray of the Midwest (I spent many of my formative years in Nebraska, South Dakota, and Utah), I resonated with this book. See what my fellow Literary Wives Angela, Ariel, and Emily have to say about this read...and tell me what you think!

We're reading The Aviator's Wife in July to discuss in August, so would love to know what you think of it if you're reading it or plan to!

Comments

  1. I loved this too, and ordinarily, I would have thought it was too sex heavy as well. But I thought that in this case, it represented ideas, like debasement in some cases, connection in others. Also, the story generally seems to have been a somewhat close reflection of real events experienced by the author in his earlier years, as revealed in his devastating autobiography.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, interesting -- I hadn't realized this was inspired by his real life (and I'm unfamiliar with his real life) -- how heartbreaking! In some ways, the sex interest was understandable given the era, the inability to discuss openly sexual desire, etc. -- so that didn't feel wholly off. Still, on the heels of my previous Literary Wife read, which had an oh-my-god-brain-bleach sex scene, it also felt so ... there.

      Delete
    2. I admit I am glad that someone has really liked this book. As I said in my initial goodreads review; I trust many people actually likes/loved this book, since it did remain on the NYT best-selling list, and I want every author to succeed, but I also wonder if this isn't Goolrick's own feelings/desires/frustration after reading brief reviews of his autobiography which was published just two years prior to this, his first fiction novel. I do think it presented a varied interpretation of "wife" from the other two we have read thus far. It certainly is a very different writing style than I am accustomed to, so probably good that I reread it and actually gained a small bit of appreciation for it in the end. (Though not much!) Thanks so much for your perspective! Your comments are definitely enlightening for me! But I'm anxious to move on to something more in my style, The Aviator's Wife by Melanie Benjamin, who is one of my absolute favorite authors. My review: http://books-n-music.blogspot.com/2013/07/a-reliable-wife-by-robert-goolrick.html.

      Delete
  2. I really liked Reliable Wife. She reminded me a lot of Cathy from East of Eden. A creature if how I thought of her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oooh that's a great comparison. Also Catherine of Wuthering Heights. I guess many literary Catherines are the tortured-soul types.

      Delete
  3. I can't decide if I want to read The Reliable Wife or not. It's gotten great reviews, but my in-real-life reading soul sister didn't like it at all.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I loved the writing in this book. The sex got annoying. I'm excited to read Goolrick's next novel, Heading Out to Wonderful. It's been waving at me from the shelves for a while now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I totally agree... I loved that the writing felt almost classical. I felt it harkened back to the Victorian novels.

      Delete
  5. This book was not for me. While I liked Goolrick's writing and I usually like gothic/noir stories, I just did not like the characters at all. It reminded me of Fingersmith, which I also did not care for. Glad you liked it though!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I loved every page, too. From the mood, to the story, to the unexpected twists, I thought it was great. I even gave it out for World Book Night two years ago. I'm not surprised we agree on this one!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teaser Tuesday, August 1: Hippos!

Winter 2017 Bloggiesta To Do Post

Mailbox Monday, July 24

Book Review: See What I Have Done by Sarah Schmidt